翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Jobidon ・ R v Jones ・ R v Jordan ・ R v Jorgensen ・ R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge ・ R v K ・ R v Kang-Brown ・ R v Kapp ・ R v Keegstra ・ R v Kewelram ・ R v Khan ・ R v Khan (South Africa) ・ R v Khelawon ・ R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ・ R v Korsten ・ R v Kouri ・ R v Krymowski ・ R v Laba ・ R v Labaye ・ R v Ladouceur ・ R v Latimer ・ R v Latimer (1997) ・ R v Lavallee ・ R v Lawrence ・ R v Leary ・ R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ・ R v Lifchus ・ R v Lipman ・ R v Loubser ・ R v Lovelass Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Kouri ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Kouri ''R v Kouri'' 2005 SCC 81 (CanLII), was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that, along with its sister case ''R v Labaye'', established that harm is the sole defining element of indecency in Canadian criminal law. The case involved a club in which couples engaged in group sex; the club was alleged to be a "common bawdy-house" (a house in which indecency or prostitution occurs). The acquittal was upheld by the Supreme Court. ==Background== In 1997, James Kouri, the owner of the Montreal club Coeur à Corps, was accused of operating a common bawdy-house and fined $7,500〔CBC News, "(Swingers clubs don't harm society, top court rules, )" December 21, 2005, URL accessed 23 December 2005.〕 under section 210(1) of the Criminal Code. The fine came after undercover investigations of the club by police that started in 1996, although the club had been established in 1985. The group sex club was for couples who, upon entering, would be asked if they were a "liberated couple." Only those who replied in the affirmative could enter, and the couples would have to pay an entrance fee. On appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal, Mr. Kouri was acquitted. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Kouri」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.